- FY2026 proposals would cut roughly $12B from the Department of Education and roll many K-12 programs into smaller, less-accountable block grants.
- Department staffing cuts, especially in civil rights and special education oversight, have sparked litigation and a court order to reinstate about 1,400 workers.
- The Educational Choice for Children Act would create a large federal tax-credit voucher program that could shift students and funding away from public schools.
- Withholding or delaying billions in Title and COVID-relief funds is tightening district budgets, hitting high-need students and services hardest.
Read More
Strategic Implications for Stakeholders
Public school districts are likely to face severe financial shortfalls. With billions in federal funding being withheld or cuts imposed, districts may be forced to eliminate programs, reduce staffing, or limit services especially for special education, English learners, and after-school programs. The loss of Title I-IV and ESSER funding reduces federal support precisely where many districts remain vulnerable [Primary]. This could prompt states to seek alternative revenue sources, raise property taxes, or reallocate existing education budgets.
State education agencies will be asked to assume greater responsibility for funding, oversight, and accountability without commensurate resources. The push toward block grants that reduce federal oversight—such as consolidating 18 K-12 grant programs into a block grant with reduced spending levels and program specificity—weakens federal levers to enforce civil rights, equity, and program effectiveness [Primary]. State agencies may need to expand their regulatory and compliance capacities abruptly.
Private schools and school choice advocates benefit from policy shifts under ECCA and proposed supplemental grant priorities. The tax credit voucher model and expanded charter school grants create financial incentives and opportunities for nontraditional providers. However, absence of accountability measures may generate legal and performance risks [Primary].
Federal oversight and civil rights enforcement are under existential strain. Layoffs in the Department of Education, particularly in the Office for Civil Rights and Special Education offices, degrade capacity to enforce federal civil rights laws and protect students from discrimination. Legal decisions—such as the May 2025 injunction ordering reinstatement of 1,400 staff—underscore judicial constraints on administrative overreach and the requirement that legally mandated roles (e.g., civil rights, special education) be preserved [Primary].
Financial and Political Risks
- Reduced federal support may shift political pain toward state leaders and school boards, especially in rural and low-income communities.
- Legal challenges and court orders suggest that some agency actions may be vulnerable to litigation—and may be reversed or delayed.
- Donor tax credits and voucher expansion might attract criticism or scrutiny regarding misuse, discrimination, or educational outcome disparities.
Open Questions and Uncertainties
- How Congress ultimately responds—through appropriations or oversight—may reshape whether proposals become law or are blocked.
- Whether states can absorb increased responsibilities for oversight and compliance amid staffing reductions.
- The real effect on student outcomes—are cuts likely to widen educational disparities in practice?
- Impact of court-mandated reinstatements—how the department infrastructure and staffing will function in the interim?
Supporting Notes
- DOE workforce reduced from ~4,100 to fewer than ~2,200 employees via layoffs and buy-outs; OCR and Special Education offices severely affected—with possible elimination of up to 95 percent of staff in those offices [Primary].
- Judge Myong J. Joun issued preliminary injunction on May 22, 2025 ordering the reinstatement of about 1,400 Education Department workers laid off since January 20, stressing the agency lacks staff needed to fulfill legally mandated functions [Primary].
- President Trump’s FY2026 budget consolidates 18 separate K-12 grants into a single block grant (K-12 Simplified Funding Program), funded ~$4.5 million less than current total funding, cutting eligibility and spending specificity by 70 percent; proposes eliminating 12 programs including Migrant Education and Educator Development Grants [Primary].
- ECCA creates a permanent uncapped federal voucher/tax-credit program costing nearly $51 billion annually; this compares to $14 billion under IDEA and $18 billion under Title I funding [Primary].
- $6.2 billion in Title I-IV grants withheld for FY25; more than $4 billion still withheld for critical K-12 programs at start of 2025-26 school year [Primary].
- Proposals to cut Pell Grant maximum from ~$7,395 to ~$5,710; eliminate SEOG; reduce Federal Work-Study drastically—all apply to higher education even though impact trickles to K-12 via expectations and college readiness [Secondary].