SEBI Accuses Bank of America of Sharing Price-Sensitive Information Ahead of Block Trade

  • SEBI alleges Bank of America shared material nonpublic, price-sensitive details ahead of a roughly $180 million 2024 block trade in Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC.
  • The regulator says information flowed beyond the deal team across broking/research/syndicate channels and via WhatsApp, including outreach to investors such as HDFC Life, Jane Street, and Norges Bank.
  • BofA initially denied wrongdoing but later, after an internal review, acknowledged off-team investor communications and submitted corrected information to SEBI.
  • The bank is preparing a multimillion-dollar settlement without admitting guilt, amid reputational and compliance fallout and senior departures in India.
Read More

The findings by SEBI represent serious alleged misconduct in how a major global investment bank managed one of its block trades. For investment banking practices, several strategic risks and implications emerge:

Regulatory and legal risk: The improper sharing of non-public, price‐sensitive information violates insider-trading rules in India and perhaps other jurisdictions. SEBI’s show-cause notice raises the risk of substantial penalties. Even though BofA is expected to settle without admitting fault, reputational damage and heightened scrutiny will increase compliance costs.

Control and compliance breakdowns: SEBI alleges that “Chinese walls” between deal teams and research/broking/syndicate/research arms were not respected. Internal guardrails failed, causing leaks not just by protocol breach but by interactions across functions (including via WhatsApp). This points to systemic weaknesses in policies, oversight, and perhaps culture.

Operational consequences: Loss of trust among institutional clients (e.g. Norges Bank) may lead to displacement in future mandates. Other mandates might being withheld or reassigned (as seen earlier in Asia) which can hit revenue and franchise strength. Also, senior departures in India suggest governance impact and internal instability.

Financial exposure: While dollar-value amounts are yet unconfirmed, the scale of the block trade (~US$180 million), and the likely multimillion-dollar settlement, signal substantial financial risk. Legal defense, compliance overhaul, and reputational mitigation will add further costs.

Strategic implications: For BofA, this may force stricter internal compliance, especially in cross-functional information flows and communication channels. Peer banks may revisit similar practices globally for block trades. Regulators elsewhere will likely look for comparable infractions, especially in markets with rulebooks similar to India’s.

Open questions:

  • Precisely how many employees were involved, their levels, and whether senior managers had direct knowledge or were complicit.
  • Which internal controls specifically failed (e.g. tech-based monitoring, communication logs, oversight of syndication/research arms), and what changes are being planned.
  • The amount and terms of the anticipated settlement and whether there will be ongoing monitoring or remedial undertakings imposed by SEBI.
  • Whether similar practices have occurred in other countries or deals, giving rise to broader regulatory exposure.
Supporting Notes
  • SEBI’s investigation found Bank of America shared price-sensitive, material non-public information about a 2024 ~$180 million block trade in Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC.
  • BofA’s deal team shared confidential data with internal staff not directly involved in the deal; communications occurred via teams including broking, research, syndicate, and over informal channels like WhatsApp.
  • Investors such as HDFC Life, Jane Street, and Norges Bank were among those who received outreach or information before the public announcement.
  • BofA initially denied wrongdoing to SEBI, claiming all procedures had been followed, but after its internal investigation turned over records showing external communications beyond the deal team.
  • Following SEBI’s notice, several senior bankers including the former head of investment banking in India have left the firm.
  • The bank is preparing to settle the matter in the millions of dollars without admitting or denying the allegations.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search
Filters
Clear All
Quick Links
Scroll to Top