- A bipartisan Senate group is close to a deal to revive the enhanced ACA premium subsidies that expired Jan. 1, 2026.
- The emerging plan would extend the credits for two years but add guardrails like an income cap (~700% FPL), a minimum premium payment, and penalties for insurer “phantom enrollments.”
- It also considers letting recipients in year two route subsidy value into a pre-funded Health Savings Account.
- Even with an agreement, passage is uncertain amid intra-party splits and abortion-funding fights tied to Hyde Amendment compliance.
Read More
The Senate group’s emerging framework aims to balance restoring financial relief to millions of Americans and controlling federal spending by reintroducing enhanced Obamacare (ACA) tax credits with guardrails.
The enhanced subsidies—which had significantly reduced premiums and expanded eligibility—expired at the end of 2025, leading to sharp increases in marketplace premiums and lowered enrollment; estimates show premiums could double or even more for many, particularly for older enrollees just above prior income eligibility thresholds.
The Senate’s proposed renewal is reportedly for two years, not the three years passed by the House bill. Key provisions include an income cap (around 700% of FPL) to limit benefit to higher earners, a minimal monthly premium requirement (~$5/month), penalties targeting insurers that enroll people without their knowledge (“phantom enrollees”), and expanded access to cost-sharing reductions and HSAs.
Administratively, offering the option to redirect subsidies into prefunded HSAs in the second year could shift incentives and change how beneficiaries manage care costs. It signals themes of consumer control, but may complicate enrollee behavior, particularly among lower-income or less financially literate segments.
Politically, voting dynamics are uncertain. The House has passed a three-year extension with all Democrats and some Republicans—17 of them—joining in, but the Senate proposal—though bipartisan—faces tougher constraints especially among conservatives wary of spending increases and abortion funding implications. The Hyde Amendment’s wire remains a sticking point.
Strategic implications include potential effects on the health insurance market as enrollment for 2026 is already down (from ~16M in 2025 to 15.6M), premium “sticker-shock,” and for both parties—Democrats emphasizing affordability in the 2026 election cycle, Republicans trying to craft conservative reformist credibility without alienating base or state-level insurers.
Open questions surround how the income cap will be set and phased in, how authorities will define and enforce “phantom enrollees,” what cost the federal government will ultimately bear, and whether the legislation can command enough votes—not just committee—across both chambers to be enacted and reconciled.
Supporting Notes
- The enhanced tax credits expired Jan. 1, 2026; a bipartisan Senate group is seeking to revive them. Sen. Bernie Moreno says legislative text could be released “realistically, probably Monday.”
- The proposed extension would be for two years, with new restrictions including a minimum $5/month premium contribution and an income eligibility cap around 700% of the federal poverty level.
- Insurer penalties would target “phantom enrollees”—people signed up for subsidized plans without realizing it.
- The plan might allow subsidy recipients the option, in year two of the extension, to route subsidy funds into a prefunded Health Savings Account.
- Premiums are projected to rise significantly without extension: ACA enrollment declined from about 16 million in 2025 to 15.6 million for 2026; average annual costs for subsidized plans may increase from $888 in 2025 to $1,904 in 2026.
- For a family of four earning ~$85,000 (≈272–300% FPL), the loss of enhanced tax credits would nearly double annual premium costs—rising from approximately $4,148 in 2025 to over $7,500 in 2026.
- The expiration of enhanced subsidies reintroduces the “subsidy cliff,” where enrollees just above 400% FPL lose eligibility and face full premiums.
- Groups influencing policy express concerns about abortion coverage. The deal seeks compliance with the Hyde Amendment and stresses that existing abortion policy would not change, treating it as a peripheral issue.